Skip to main content
UI Coach Logo
Back to challenges
Hard

Cloud Cost Anomaly Investigation

Design an investigation workspace that connects an unexpected cloud spend increase with services, owners, and reversible actions.

Desktop web

The brief

Understand the problem

Background

A cost spike may come from real demand, a pricing change, duplicate resources, data transfer, or delayed billing records. Immediate shutdown can harm customers, while waiting can rapidly increase spend.

User context

FinOps analyst Rae sees daily storage costs rise forty percent. The increase is concentrated in one region after a backup policy change, but invoice data is still incomplete.

Product problem

Investigators need to understand magnitude, confidence, contributing dimensions, and service ownership before recommending a response.

Objective

Create anomaly summary, cost decomposition, owner collaboration, and action review for one cloud-spend incident.

What to design

Define the experience

Required experience

  • Assess anomaly size, timing, and data completeness
  • Break cost down by service, region, account, and tag
  • Contact the responsible owner with evidence
  • Approve a safe mitigation and track realized savings

Screens and states

  • Cost anomaly overview
  • Cost decomposition
  • Owner investigation
  • Mitigation review

Core user flow

Follow the critical path

  1. 01

    Rae opens the storage anomaly and checks billing freshness

  2. 02

    She narrows the increase to backup replicas in one region

  3. 03

    The service owner confirms a policy misconfiguration

  4. 04

    They reduce retention for new copies and monitor cost without deleting protected backups

Product rules

Requirements and constraints

Requirements

  • Show actual, expected, forecast, and data-completeness states
  • Support dimension comparison without double counting
  • Link resources to accountable owners and recent changes
  • Estimate action impact and identify operational risk before execution

Constraints

  • Billing data may arrive late or be revised
  • Cost controls cannot directly delete resources from the investigation view
  • Shared-cost allocation rules must be visible

Reality check

States worth considering

Tags are missing
A pricing change resembles usage growth
Several services share the same resource
Savings cannot be confirmed until the next invoice

Ready-to-use content

Mock data

Use this content to test hierarchy and realistic data states. You can expand it when the concept needs more depth.

Cost dimensions

  • Object storage: plus $8,420
  • Region ap-southeast-1: 78 percent of increase
  • Backup replicas: 12,600 new copies

Data status

  • Usage through 10:00 UTC
  • Invoice estimate 82 percent complete
  • Next refresh in 45 minutes

Finish line

What to deliver

  • Four desktop screens from uncertain anomaly through verified mitigation

Optional direction

Visual resources

Use these as a starting constraint if you want one. They are not part of the required solution.

Color palette
#A9A4CE
#05623B
#1F1109
#79829C
#6CBCB4
Font pairing
Open SansSource Sans Pro

Open Sans & Source Sans Pro

Clear interface writing gives people the confidence to understand what changed and decide what to do next.

Icons
Illustrations

Theory to review

UX principles for this brief

Use these as decision lenses, then validate the design with the people and context in the brief.