Skip to main content
UI Coach Logo
Back to challenges
Hard

Guided Portfolio Rebalance

Design an investment review that proposes a diversified rebalance and requires informed approval before any order.

Responsive web, Mobile

The brief

Understand the problem

Background

Automated investing can simplify portfolio maintenance, but customers still need to understand risk, fees, taxes, assumptions, and what will happen before orders are placed.

User context

Farah has a long-term investment account that has drifted toward technology stocks. She wants to compare a proposed rebalance against leaving the portfolio unchanged.

Product problem

Investors need a comprehensible recommendation and meaningful control over a consequential financial action.

Objective

Design portfolio diagnosis, proposal comparison, risk disclosure, and explicit order confirmation for a guided rebalance.

What to design

Define the experience

Required experience

  • Confirm goal, horizon, and risk profile
  • Review current concentration and data freshness
  • Compare the proposal with no-action and lower-turnover options
  • Approve, edit, or decline the resulting orders

Screens and states

  • Portfolio health overview
  • Rebalance comparison
  • Order review
  • Execution status

Core user flow

Follow the critical path

  1. 01

    Farah verifies her ten-year goal and risk tolerance

  2. 02

    She reviews why concentration increased and when prices were captured

  3. 03

    She chooses a lower-turnover option after seeing tax implications

  4. 04

    She confirms each order and tracks partial fills

Product rules

Requirements and constraints

Requirements

  • Present assumptions, fees, tax considerations, and downside scenarios
  • Separate recommendations from guaranteed outcomes
  • Require review and explicit confirmation before trading
  • Support order editing, cancellation windows, and execution status

Constraints

  • Suitability checks and required disclosures cannot be skipped
  • Market prices can change between proposal and execution
  • The interface must not use loss recovery promises or manipulative urgency

Reality check

States worth considering

Risk profile is incomplete
The market is closed
An asset cannot be sold
An order fills only partially

Finish line

What to deliver

  • Four responsive screens showing proposal tradeoffs and explicit confirmation

Optional direction

Visual resources

Use these as a starting constraint if you want one. They are not part of the required solution.

Color palette
#1C1B19
#C7B89F
#649853
#735D5F
#87759D
Font pairing
ArvoLato

Arvo & Lato

Clear interface writing gives people the confidence to understand what changed and decide what to do next.

Icons
Illustrations