Skip to main content
UI Coach Logo
Back to challenges
Intermediate

Turn Wedding Research Into Decisions

Design a planning hub that helps a couple compare advice, shortlist vendors, and record decisions without managing the entire wedding.

Responsive web, Mobile

The brief

Understand the problem

Background

Wedding research arrives from articles, family suggestions, venue rules, and vendor quotes. Couples can collect plenty of inspiration yet lose the reasoning behind a final choice.

User context

Sam and Jordan are comparing three venues. One fits the budget, one is easier for guests to reach, and one includes catering but has strict timing rules.

Product problem

Generic tips and saved images do not support tradeoffs. Collaborators need a shared shortlist with criteria, source context, and a clear record of what has been decided.

Objective

Create a focused venue research and decision flow for two equal collaborators.

What to design

Define the experience

Required experience

  • Shared planning priorities
  • Venue shortlist with comparable facts and source notes
  • Side-by-side decision workspace
  • Recorded decision and follow-up tasks

Screens and states

  • Planning priorities
  • Venue shortlist
  • Venue comparison
  • Decision detail

Core user flow

Follow the critical path

  1. 01

    Sam and Jordan agree on budget, capacity, and access priorities

  2. 02

    They save three venues from research articles and quotes

  3. 03

    They compare confirmed facts, open questions, and tradeoffs

  4. 04

    Each adds a private preference before discussing

  5. 05

    They record a decision and create the next two tasks

Product rules

Requirements and constraints

Requirements

  • Separate verified venue facts from personal notes and article claims
  • Allow collaborators to weight priorities independently
  • Highlight missing comparison data without choosing for the couple
  • Record the reason and date behind a decision
  • Keep rejected options available for reference

Constraints

  • Vendor information changes and quotes expire
  • Collaborators may have conflicting priorities
  • Some costs are estimates rather than fixed prices

Reality check

States worth considering

A venue becomes unavailable after being favored
One collaborator edits a shared priority
Two quotes include different services
A previously rejected venue is reconsidered

Finish line

What to deliver

  • Design four responsive screens for shared priorities, comparison, and a reversible decision.

Optional direction

Visual resources

Use these as a starting constraint if you want one. They are not part of the required solution.

Color palette
#1C1B19
#C7B89F
#649853
#735D5F
#87759D
Font pairing
SpectralKarla

Spectral & Karla

Clear interface writing gives people the confidence to understand what changed and decide what to do next.

Icons
Illustrations