Skip to main content
UI Coach Logo
Back to challenges
Hard

Review a Risky Project Dependency

Design a project review that exposes how one delayed dependency affects milestones, owners, and credible mitigation choices.

Desktop web

The brief

Understand the problem

Background

Project plans often show dependency arrows but fail to explain impact when an upstream date becomes uncertain. Teams then debate dates without a shared view of assumptions or the tradeoffs behind a mitigation.

User context

Aisha manages a checkout redesign. A security review owned by another team may slip by two weeks, which affects testing, launch communications, and a partner commitment.

Product problem

A project lead needs to assess uncertainty, map downstream consequences, and gain agreement on a mitigation without rewriting the entire project plan.

Objective

Create a dependency-risk review for one threatened milestone and its immediate downstream work.

What to design

Define the experience

Required experience

  • Inspect the dependency, confidence, owner, and evidence
  • Trace affected milestones and commitments
  • Compare mitigation scenarios and their tradeoffs
  • Record a decision with owners and review conditions

Screens and states

  • Dependency risk detail
  • Impact map
  • Mitigation comparison
  • Decision record

Core user flow

Follow the critical path

  1. 01

    Aisha opens the security review dependency after its confidence changes to low

  2. 02

    She traces the two-week slip to testing and partner launch commitments

  3. 03

    She compares reducing launch scope, adding review capacity, and moving the date

  4. 04

    Stakeholders choose a reduced first release with explicit acceptance criteria

  5. 05

    The plan records owners, changed dates, and a review trigger if security slips again

Product rules

Requirements and constraints

Requirements

  • Separate confirmed dates from estimates and assumptions
  • Show direct and downstream impact without turning the screen into a full project graph
  • Compare schedule, scope, cost, and risk for each mitigation
  • Capture who approved the plan and which commitments changed
  • Notify affected owners only after the decision is published

Constraints

  • The dependency owner belongs to another team and controls its estimate
  • Historical plan dates must remain available for audit
  • The product cannot claim certainty from a single confidence label

Reality check

States worth considering

The upstream owner provides no new date
Two mitigations depend on the same scarce specialist
A downstream task has already started
Stakeholders cannot agree before the review deadline

Finish line

What to deliver

  • Four desktop screens that move one dependency risk from discovery to an approved mitigation

Optional direction

Visual resources

Use these as a starting constraint if you want one. They are not part of the required solution.

Color palette
#1C1B19
#C7B89F
#649853
#735D5F
#87759D
Font pairing
BioRhymeMontserrat

BioRhyme & Montserrat

Clear interface writing gives people the confidence to understand what changed and decide what to do next.

Icons
Illustrations